A Semester’s Growth Through Arguments and Reflections

Reflecting on the work accomplished this semester, it's been quite a journey of exploration and learning. I want to take a closer look and briefly critique three arguments that I wrote this semester and assess my own growth in understanding and writing ability. I really enjoy writing but sometimes struggle to feel that I am good at it. It is less cut-and-dry than the math and science realm that I am used to. Intentionally being diverse in word usage and “making every word count” has been my goal this semester in my writing. Honing my literature review and Google Scholar mining ability has also been paramount to my growth this semester. Click on the titles to read the full text of the arguments.

Argument 1: An Argument for Web-Based Instruction

As I review this argument, I realize how much deeper my understanding of online learning has become. The journey from just discussing its prevalence post-pandemic to delving into its nuances has been enlightening. However, I acknowledge that there's still plenty to learn, especially in terms of understanding the intricacies of technology integration and instructor training. Incorporating more recent research and diverse perspectives could add depth to my analysis.

Argument 2: Gamification: A Tool for Learning or a Distraction?

Exploring gamification as an educational tool is really in my wheelhouse. I've gained a better grasp of motivational psychology and its application in academia. Yet, there's more ground to cover, particularly in terms of ethical considerations and cultural differences in response to gamification. It's a reminder that there's always more to learn and consider. This is one of my primary research focuses, so this assignment was a helpful delve into the value of gamification.

Argument 3: The Role of Online Instructors in Modern Education

Analyzing the role of online instructors has given me insight into the complexities of virtual learning environments. I recognize the need to explore further evolving dynamics in online teaching methodologies and inclusive instructional practices. Incorporating diverse perspectives on instructor-student interactions could enrich my understanding of this topic. Nothing will replace a dedicated, present, and knowledgeable teacher. I do feel like my scholarly writing improved from argument 1 to argument 3, as well as my intentionality in being more diverse in my vocabulary usage.


As I look back from Argument 1 to Argument 3, I see a few evidences of growth:

1. Depth of Analysis: In Argument 1, I provided a fairly thorough examination of the topic of web-based instruction, but as I progressed to Argument 3, my analysis became more nuanced and comprehensive. In Argument 3, I delved into various aspects of the role of online instructors, including their responsibilities, impact on student engagement, and the importance of mentorship. I believe this exhibited a deeper understanding of the subject matter and the ability to explore multiple facets of a topic.

2. Integration of Evidence: While all arguments included evidence to support claims, the sophistication in the integration of evidence increased from Argument 1 to Argument 3. In Argument 1, I primarily presented evidence in the form of studies and statistics. However, in Argument 3, I was able to incorporate evidence while also weaving in insights from researchers and scholars, which added depth and credibility to my analysis.

3. Clarity and Coherence: I feel like my writing in Argument 3 exhibited improved clarity and coherence compared to Argument 1. The ideas were organized more effectively, with smoother transitions between paragraphs and sections. This made it easier for the reader to follow my line of reasoning and understand the main points more easily.

4. Engagement with Counterarguments: In Argument 3, I demonstrated a greater willingness to engage with potential counterarguments and address them effectively. Dr. Cockerham brought this to my attention in my first two arguments. For example, in argument 3, I acknowledged the viewpoint that technology could potentially replace instructors, but I countered it with evidence and reasoning to emphasize the essential role of instructors in education. I believe this reflective approach shows a deeper level of critical thinking and analysis.

Overall, my writing evolved from Argument 1 to Argument 3, showing growth in analytical depth, evidence integration, clarity, coherence, and engagement with counterarguments. I believe these improvements indicate a maturation in my understanding and writing ability over the semester.


After reflecting, here are areas that can help me continue to grow and improve:

1. Engagement with Diverse Perspectives: I've come to realize the importance of seeking out diverse viewpoints and incorporating them into my arguments. It's a journey of continuous learning and understanding.

2. Critical Evaluation of Sources: Strengthening my ability to evaluate sources critically will be vital in strengthening my scholarly writing ability, ensuring that the foundation of my writing is solid and credible.

3. Refinement of Writing Structure: In the future, I aim to refine the structure of my writing, striving for clarity and coherence, effectively conveying complex ideas to readers in a way that's engaging and understandable. This has been my most significant area of growth this semester, and it has helped me to understand how I can refine my writing structure so that I can continue to progress.

4. Effective Utilization of Feedback: I'm committed to actively seeking and incorporating feedback from peers and instructors. It's through this process that I can continue to grow and improve both my understanding and writing ability.


As I look ahead to my upcoming research endeavors, I know I'll face some hurdles in sorting through the heaps of literature and staying objective in my analysis. But you know what? I'm kind of excited about it! I see these challenges as opportunities to fuel my curiosity and keep on learning. After all, it's through tackling these experiences head-on that I'll keep evolving and honing my skills as both a researcher and a writer.

Previous
Previous

Why Experiential Learning Matters in Science Education

Next
Next

Enhancing Higher Education: The Impact of Innovative Instructional Design